Who will win the 2020 presidential election?
Can the folks from Randy Lewis Racing REALLY accurately predict who will win the 2020 presidential election? Here’s how we see it. We’ve got a 50% chance! Remember, it’s easy to forget. This post is about polling, not politics.
Latest update: October 30, 2020
Please use the dropdown menus for each topic that interests you.
I used to love betting on sporting events. I could take the most off-the-wall game that I had no interest in, something like the Jacksonville Jaguars playing the Tennessee Titans and place a wager. If I bet on the Jaguars I instantly became a huge Jaguar fan and vice versa. I don’t bet on games much anymore. I’m pretty sure you will not find a more apolitical individual than me. Nevertheless, I am intrigued by the outcome of the upcoming 2020 presidential election. That being the case I’m going to share some information with you that I get from a smartphone app called “PocketPolls”. Before I go any further I will accept the fact that Democrats essentially hate Republicans and Republicans essentially hate Democrats. I’m not trying to change that. Hate on brothers and sisters. I’m just acknowledging that as fact. Some folks might challenge the word “hate”. They might prefer personal distaste, a distinct repelling feeling or whatever. I think hate covers most situations. I know that each side spends most of their day criticizing and degrading the other party. Why? I guess just for the pure fun of it. In order to support one political party or the other that supporter has to denigrate any data that is supplied by the other side as being inaccurate, biased, distorted, and most likely all of those things. That’s usually until that data turns around and begins to support their point of view. It kinda goes like this, “The polls are bogus because they aren’t supporting my guy. I don’t believe ’em. Now the polls are tightening in favor of my guy. Yep. I believe in the polls”. Luckily, I guess, there are about 10-20% of the population who fall in between these two groups…..or outside these two groups.
Below I will share the results from a variety of polling organizations. I don’t support or endorse any of these groups. I couldn’t tell you if Charlie Manson’s children are behind one poll or the other. I am simply sharing the information verbatim. The polls I am sharing were taken as early as August 3, 2020, 90 days before the election date. As we go along I will continue to update the various polls. That might be a hassle but it’s only for two more months. You can come to this page as often as you want to see what the latest results are. I’m sure some will look at the polling sources and yell at their computer screen, “I wouldn’t believe those #$^#&$ for a New York minute!” While at the very same time another reader is looking at the same poll results and nodding their head yes as if to say, “That sounds reasonable to me”.
I actually happen to believe in polls in general. I figure if I asked a group of my friends how likely they were to come to my birthday party most of them would be willing to answer that question. If I asked all likely attendees if they preferred chocolate cake or vanilla cake (I would pick vanilla and probably wouldn’t even ask my quests this question) I’m pretty sure they would tell me their choice. Are people too shy, once they are asked a question to tell a stranger who they would vote for as their presidential choice? I don’t think so. I base this on just returning from a five-day, five-state tour of the midwest. It seemed as if every other lawn had a political sign touting their favorite. Yes, I believe in the presidential polls…in general…regardless of which candidate they might be in favor at the time the poll was taken. I would caution against one thing. I am only the messenger. Don’t try to kill the messenger. If your guy is ahead in a particular poll it’s not all that worthwhile to crow about it. If your guy is behind in a particular poll it’s not all that worthwhile to denigrate the polls. I know that lots of people are fond of saying the polls got it wrong last time and they normally get it wrong. I don’t really support that kind of thinking. If I were running a polling organization I would like to make my results as accurate as possible so that somebody might hire me based upon my expert polling capabilities the next time around.
Below you will see how Randy Lewis Racing is projecting the outcome of the race. Please….save your “I told you so messages”. This is based upon the most current polls. They may change a little or a lot and not at all in the coming days and weeks. If the polls change from one candidate to another then I will change my prediction. I am just projecting the results of all available national and state polls that appear in my PocketPolls app. 1. I will first list the projected electoral votes for the 2020 election by candidate. This is based upon the 2016 election results and current polling. From here you will see exactly who Randy Lewis Racing expects to win the election….now. However, if the polls change RLR can and will change their prediction. 2. The national polls are next. I’ll take an average of all national polls always deleting any “old” poll by one pollster who has published a more recent poll. No double counting. I’ll keep the numbers from all polls since August 3, 2020 (90 days before the election) up to the most current so you can see the results from each pollster. That way you can get an apples to apples comparison (changes in the poll…from the same pollster, etc.). Trust me, only the most recent results from each pollster are included in the results. You can trust ME, right? I’m the most apolitical person you know. 3. This section includes the state polls. Same rationale as the national polls. 4. Next is a table that shows the popular vote percentages for each candidate from the 2016 election. Some states are already pretty well decided. About ten others are still in the undecided category. I’m using the current polls to allocate those electoral votes to whichever candidate has the current lead in that state in the most current polls. If one political party won a state by more than 5% in 2016 I’m giving them credit for that state to carry in the 2020 election. When the 2016 results were somewhat close and/or the polls are somewhat close now I’m throwing that state in the undecided category. I think it might be kind of fun to look at this ongoingly and just see how close these prognosticators come to do the actual results. I do know that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in the 2016 election by about 3 million votes. I did some research and found 38 different polls that were projecting the results the week before the 2016 election. On average Clinton was expected to win by 2.7%. I don’t know if those projections were for the popular vote or simply to win the election outright. Probably to win the election. A variance of 2.7% doesn’t seem like much to me, certainly not a landslide. On the other hand, President Trump won three different large states (Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin) by a total of 77,000 votes. It’s pretty amazing that in a country with 350 million people (about 136 million people voted) the fact that if about 40,000 people have voted for the other candidate the electoral college results would have been different. Did the 2016 pollsters really get it wrong? It’s true they didn’t pick the winner. But in reality, the polls didn’t seem to be off by very much to me….if 40,000 people vote the other way the polls were right…..but 40,000 people voted for who they voted for….so the national polls were wrong. Again, I am not providing this to support either candidate. I told you I was the most apolitical individual that you know and I am. You can leave a message on this post. However, if I deem it to be political, and my stuff is never about politics, I will simply delete it. Feel free to rant and rave in personal messages to me. I can take it. I wish good luck and good health to each of the 2020 presidential political candidates. The future is impossible to predict…but polls might help with that. Heaven forbid if one candidate or the other tests positive for COVID-19 before the election. I wouldn’t want to be the campaign manager who gets to share that information (or not!) with the public. I do know this. It’s my saying of the year. “It doesn’t matter what people read, see or hear…it’s what they think and want to believe”. votes Projected winner
Projected Electoral
2020
Electoral votes
Trump
Biden
Polls
188
350
Alabama
9
9
Alaska
3
3
Arizona
11
11
+2.7%
B
Arkansas
6
6
California
55
55
Colorado
9
9
Connecticut
7
7
Delaware
3
3
District of Columbia
3
3
Florida
29
29
+2.3%
B
Georgia
16
16
+2.1%
B
Hawaii
4
4
Idaho
4
4
Illinois
20
20
Indiana
11
11
Iowa
6
6
+0.2%
T
Kansas
6
6
Kentucky
8
8
Louisiana
8
8
Maine*
4
4
Maryland
10
10
Massachusetts
11
11
Michigan
16
16
+8.1
B
Minnesota
10
10
+8.2
B
Mississippi
6
6
Missouri
10
10
Montana
3
3
Nebraska*
5
5
Nevada
6
6
+5.6
B
New Hampshire
4
4
New Jersey
14
14
New Mexico
5
5
New York
29
29
North Carolina
15
15
+2.2
B
North Dakota
3
3
Ohio
18
18
1.7
T
Oklahoma
7
7
Oregon
7
7
Pennsylvania
20
20
+5.8
B
Rhode Island
4
4
South Carolina
9
9
South Dakota
3
3
Tennessee
11
11
Texas
38
38
1.0
T
Utah
6
6
Vermont
3
3
Virginia
13
13
Washington
12
12
West Virginia
5
5
Wisconsin
10
10
+8.0
B
Wyoming
3
3
* Maine/Nebraska allow their votes to be split by congressional district
Assumes the party that won a state in 2016 wins it again unless there is a big 2020 poll change
NATIONAL POLL RESULTS
Trump
Biden
Variance
3 Week National Average
1-Sep
41.7%
49.8%
8.1%
3 Week National Average
9-Sep
42.0%
49.6%
7.6%
3 Week National Average
14-Sep
42.6%
49.7%
7.1%
3 Week National Average
17-Sep
42.1%
50.3%
8.2%
3 Week National Average
25-Sep
42.0%
50.3%
8.3%
3 Week National Average
28-Sep
41.7%
50.3%
8.6%
3 Week National Average
4-Oct
42.1%
50.2%
8.1%
3 Week National Average
8-Oct
41.8%
50.6%
8.8%
3 Week National Average
12-Oct
41.8%
50.8%
9.0%
3 Week National Average
14-Oct
41.6%
51.2%
9.6%
3 Week National Average
19-Oct
41.3%
51.6%
10.3%
3 Week National Average
22-Oct
41.6%
51.7%
10.1%
3 Week National Average
27-Oct
41.7%
51.6%
9.9%
3 Week National Average
29-Oct
42.4%
51.6%
9.2%
ABC News/Washington Post
15-Aug
44.0%
54.0%
ABC News/Washington Post
24-Sep
43.0%
53.0%
ABC News/Washington Post
9-Oct
43.0%
54.0%
43.0%
54.0%
AP/NORC
14-Sep
40.0%
44.0%
AP/NORC
12-Oct
36.0%
51.0%
36.0%
51.0%
Atlas International
30-Aug
46.3%
49.4%
Atlas International
28-Oct
50.9%
46.2%
50.9%
46.2%
CCES/YouGov
27-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
43.0%
51.0%
Change Research
23-Aug
43.0%
51.0%
Change Research
6-Sep
43.0%
49.0%
Change Research
20-Sep
42.0%
51.0%
Change Research
30-Sep
41.0%
54.0%
Change Research
4-Oct
42.0%
52.0%
Change Research
18-Oct
42.0%
52.0%
Change Research
24-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
43.0%
51.0%
Climate/Nexus
9-Sep
41.0%
52.0%
41.0%
52.0%
Colby College
23-Sep
43.0%
46.0%
Colby College
25-Oct
42.0%
46.0%
42.0%
46.0%
Cometrends
26-Oct
44.0%
56.0%
44.0%
56.0%
CNBC
24-Oct
40.0%
51.0%
40.0%
51.0%
CNN/SSRS
15-Aug
46.0%
50.0%
CNN/SSRS
1-Sep
43.0%
51.0%
CNN/SSRS
4-Oct
41.0%
56.0%
CNN/SSRS
26-Oct
42.0%
54.0%
42.0%
54.0%
Critical Insights
9-Aug
38.0%
39.0%
Critical Insights
4-Oct
49.0%
41.0%
49.0%
41.0%
Data for Progress
14-Aug
41.0%
50.0%
Data for Progress
1-Sep
42.8%
53.0%
Data for Progress
15-Sep
42.2%
52.8%
Data for Progress
1-Oct
41.0%
51.0%
Data for Progress
6-Oct
40.8%
56.2%
Data for Progress
20-Oct
43.7%
53.9%
43.7%
53.9%
Ecelon Insights
18-Aug
38.0%
51.0%
Ecelon Insights
25-Sep
41.0%
50.0%
Ecelon Insights
20-Oct
44.0%
50.0%
44.0%
50.0%
Ecos Research
16-Aug
41.5%
42.9%
41.5%
42.9%
Edison Research
8-Oct
34.8%
48.1%
34.8%
48.1%
Emerson College
31-Aug
48.5%
51.5%
Emerson College
25-Sep
46.6%
49.6%
46.6%
49.6%
Emerson College
26-Oct
46.7%
50.9%
46.7%
50.9%
Fabrizio Ward/Hart
5-Sep
35.0%
58.0%
45.0%
49.0%
FM3 Research
4-Oct
42.0%
53.0%
45.0%
49.0%
Fox News
12-Aug
42.0%
49.0%
Fox News
10-Sep
46.0%
51.0%
Fox News
6-Oct
43.0%
52.0%
43.0%
52.0%
GBAO
19-Oct
40.0%
53.0%
40.0%
53.0%
Georgetown University
6-Aug
40.0%
53.3%
40.0%
53.3%
Global Marketing Research
4-Oct
37.0%
51.0%
Global Marketing Research
27-Oct
38.0%
52.5%
38.0%
52.5%
Global Strategy
24-Aug
41.0%
54.0%
Global Strategy
31-Aug
43.0%
52.0%
Global Strategy
14-Sep
42.0%
53.0%
Global Strategy
21-Sep
42.0%
53.0%
Global Strategy
28-Sep
43.0%
53.0%
Global Strategy
5-Oct
44.0%
52.0%
Global Strategy
12-Oct
43.0%
53.0%
Global Strategy
19-Oct
43.0%
53.0%
43.0%
53.0%
HarrisX
28-Aug
38.0%
47.0%
HarrisX
31-Aug
40.0%
46.0%
HarrisX
2-Sep
47.0%
53.0%
HarrisX
8-Sep
39.0%
47.0%
HarrisX
14-Sep
39.0%
45.0%
HarrisX
21-Sep
40.0%
45.0%
HarrisX
24-Sep
45.0%
47.0%
HarrisX
1-Oct
40.0%
47.0%
HarrisX
6-Oct
40.0%
45.0%
HarrisX
13-Oct
40.0%
47.0%
HarrisX
15-Oct
42.0%
46.0%
HarrisX
28-Oct
47.0%
53.0%
47.0%
53.0%
Hart Research
7-Sep
43.0%
51.0%
43.0%
51.0%
Hofstra University
22-Sep
41.9%
53.2%
Hofstra University
26-Oct
42.5%
53.9%
42.5%
53.9%
IBD/TIPP
1-Sep
41.0%
49.0%
IBD/TIPP
19-Sep
43.9%
49.5%
IBD/TIPP
1-Oct
45.9%
48.6%
IBD/TIPP
12-Oct
42.4%
51.4%
IBD/TIPP
17-Oct
44.1%
49.8%
IBD/TIPP
21-Oct
45.6%
49.8%
IBD/TIPP
25-Oct
44.7%
51.5%
IBD/TIPP
28-Oct
44.8%
50.3%
44.8%
50.3%
Inovative Research
6-Oct
42.0%
47.0%
42.0%
47.0%
Ipsos
25-Aug
37.0%
44.0%
Ipsos
1-Sep
38.0%
43.0%
Ipsos
8-Sep
40.0%
48.0%
Ipsos
15-Sep
41.0%
50.0%
Ipsos
17-Sep
42.0%
51.0%
Ipsos
24-Sep
41.0%
50.0%
Ipsos
1-Oct
41.0%
50.0%
Ipsos
3-Oct
40.0%
48.0%
Ipsos
6-Oct
40.0%
52.0%
Ipsos
8-Oct
41.0%
53.0%
Ipsos
13-Oct
37.0%
43.0%
Ipsos
15-Oct
38.0%
48.0%
Ipsos
20-Oct
42.0%
51.0%
Ipsos
22-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
Ipsos
27-Oct
42.0%
52.0%
42.0%
52.0%
J.L. Partners
23-Sep
41.0%
51.0%
J.L. Partners
13-Oct
42.0%
52.0%
J.L. Partners
28-Oct
41.0%
55.0%
41.0%
55.0%
John Zogby
29-Aug
42.0%
45.0%
John Zogby
2-Oct
44.9%
47.3%
44.9%
47.3%
Kaiser Family Foundation
3-Sep
43.0%
48.0%
Kaiser Family Foundation
12-Oct
38.0%
49.0%
38.0%
49.0%
Leger
23-Aug
40.0%
49.0%
Leger
30-Aug
42.0%
49.0%
Leger
6-Sep
41.0%
47.0%
Leger
13-Sep
41.0%
47.0%
Leger
20-Sep
41.0%
48.0%
Leger
27-Sep
40.0%
47.0%
Leger
4-Oct
40.0%
49.0%
Leger
11-Oct
39.0%
50.0%
Leger
18-Oct
41.0%
50.0%
Leger
25-Oct
41.0%
49.0%
41.0%
49.0%
LOC Wick
28-Aug
49.3%
47.5%
49.3%
47.5%
Long Island University
27-Oct
36.0%
47.0%
36.0%
47.0%
Marist College
11-Aug
42.0%
53.0%
Marist College
16-Sep
42.0%
49.0%
Marist College
13-Oct
42.0%
54.0%
42.0%
54.0%
Marquette Law School
15-Sep
40.0%
50.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Monmouth University
10-Aug
41.0%
51.0%
Monmouth University
8-Sep
44.0%
51.0%
Monmouth University
27-Sep
45.0%
50.0%
45.0%
50.0%
Morning Consult
23-Aug
42.0%
52.0%
Morning Consult
29-Aug
43.0%
51.0%
Morning Consult
5-Sep
44.0%
50.0%
Morning Consult
13-Sep
43.0%
51.0%
Morning Consult
22-Sep
41.0%
48.0%
Morning Consult
27-Sep
44.0%
51.0%
Morning Consult
2-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
Morning Consult
7-Oct
43.0%
52.0%
Morning Consult
9-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
Morning Consult
14-Oct
43.0%
52.0%
Morning Consult
20-Oct
43.0%
52.0%
Morning Consult
25-Oct
43.0%
52.0%
43.0%
52.0%
NBC News/Wall Street Journal
12-Aug
41.0%
50.0%
NBC News/Wall Street Journal
16-Sep
43.0%
51.0%
NBC News/Wall Street Journal
1-Oct
39.0%
53.0%
NBC News/Wall Street Journal
12-Oct
42.0%
53.0%
42.0%
53.0%
Opinium
26-Aug
39.1%
53.6%
Opinium
10-Sep
42.2%
51.2%
Opinium
12-Oct
40.0%
57.0%
Opinium
29-Oct
41.0%
53.0%
41.0%
53.0%
Pan Atlantic Research
6-Oct
36.5%
54.0%
36.5%
54.0%
Pew Research Center
10/
42.0%
52.0%
42.0%
52.0%
Politico/Harvard
6-Sep
42.0%
52.0%
42.0%
52.0%
Public Religion Research
12-Oct
38.0%
56.0%
38.0%
56.0%
Qriously
31-Aug
41.0%
46.0%
Qriously
7-Sep
41.0%
47.0%
Qriously
13-Sep
42.0%
46.0%
Qriously
20-Sep
38.6%
46.4%
Qriously
27-Sep
40.0%
50.0%
Qriously
4-Oct
38.0%
51.0%
Qriously
12-Oct
38.0%
52.0%
Qriously
19-Oct
39.0%
51.0%
Qriously
26-Oct
39.0%
49.0%
39.0%
49.0%
Quinnipiac University
31-Aug
42.0%
52.0%
Quinnipiac University
14-Sep
44.0%
53.0%
Quinnipiac University
21-Sep
42.0%
52.0%
Quinnipiac University
19-Oct
41.0%
51.0%
41.0%
51.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
25-Aug
45.0%
46.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
1-Sep
45.0%
49.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
8-Sep
45.9%
47.6%
Rasmussen/Pulse
15-Sep
46.6%
46.1%
Rasmussen/Pulse
22-Sep
47.0%
48.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
29-Sep
43.0%
51.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
6-Oct
40.0%
52.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
13-Oct
45.0%
50.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
20-Oct
46.0%
49.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
25-Oct
48.0%
47.0%
Rasmussen/Pulse
28-Oct
47.0%
48.0%
47.0%
48.0%
Redfield & Wilton
26-Aug
38.8%
48.9%
Redfield & Wilton
1-Sep
40.8%
49.1%
Redfield & Wilton
8-Sep
40.3%
49.3%
Redfield & Wilton
17-Sep
41.5%
48.6%
Redfield & Wilton
23-Sep
41.0%
50.0%
Redfield & Wilton
27-Sep
40.0%
50.0%
Redfield & Wilton
4-Oct
42.0%
50.0%
Redfield & Wilton
10-Oct
41.0%
49.0%
Redfield & Wilton
18-Oct
40.0%
51.0%
Redfield & Wilton
26-Oct
37.0%
47.0%
37.0%
47.0%
Research Co.
4-Aug
38.0%
48.0%
Research Co.
6-Sep
41.0%
49.0%
Research Co.
18-Oct
42.0%
50.0%
42.0%
50.0%
Rethink Priorities
20-Oct
41.5%
51.3%
41.5%
51.3%
RMG Research
29-Aug
44.0%
48.0%
RMG Research
12-Sep
43.0%
48.0%
RMG Research
19-Sep
44.0%
50.0%
RMG Research
26-Sep
45.0%
51.0%
RMG Research
3-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
RMG Research
10-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
RMG Research
17-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
RMG Research
24-Oct
44.0%
51.0%
44.0%
51.0%
Saint Leo University
2-Oct
38.3%
52.1%
38.3%
52.1%
Siena College/NY Times
16-Sep
45.0%
47.0%
Siena College/NY Times
24-Sep
41.0%
49.0%
Siena College/NY Times
27-Sep
41.0%
48.0%
Siena College/NY Times
18-Oct
41.0%
50.0%
41.0%
50.0%
Slezer & Co.
30-Aug
41.0%
49.0%
41.0%
49.0%
Spry Strategies
23-Oct
46.0%
47.9%
46.0%
47.9%
Suffolk University
31-Aug
41.6%
46.9%
Suffolk University
20-Sep
45.5%
46.8%
Suffolk University
27-Oct
44.3%
51.8%
44.3%
51.8%
SurveyMonkey
30-Sep
46.0%
52.0%
SurveyMonkey
11-Oct
46.5%
51.5%
SurveyMonkey
17-Oct
45.0%
53.0%
SurveyMonkey
20-Oct
46.0%
52.0%
SurveyMonkey
25-Oct
46.0%
52.0%
46.0%
52.0%
SurveyUSA
4-Oct
43.0%
53.0%
SurveyUSA
19-Oct
43.0%
53.0%
43.0%
53.0%
SurveyUSA
27-Oct
48.6%
51.4%
48.6%
51.4%
Swayable
26-Oct
45.7%
51.4%
45.7%
51.4%
Targoz Market Research
6-Sep
46.3%
47.5%
46.3%
47.5%
Tufts
25-Oct
45.0%
52.0%
45.0%
52.0%
University of Maryland
23-Aug
38.9%
47.5%
38.9%
47.5%
University of Massachusetts Lowell
12-Oct
43.0%
53.0%
43.0%
53.0%
USC Dornsife
30-Aug
40.2%
53.6%
USC Dornsife
31-Aug
41.6%
51.9%
USC Dornsife
4-Sep
41.1%
52.1%
USC Dornsife
12-Sep
40.5%
54.3%
USC Dornsife
15-Sep
43.4%
50.4%
USC Dornsife
19-Sep
42.2%
51.6%
USC Dornsife
23-Sep
42.0%
51.9%
USC Dornsife
26-Sep
42.5%
51.4%
USC Dornsife
1-Oct
43.3%
51.3%
USC Dornsife
3-Oct
42.7%
52.2%
USC Dornsife
6-Oct
42.4%
52.6%
USC Dornsife
10-Oct
41.6%
53.4%
USC Dornsife
12-Oct
41.3%
54.0%
USC Dornsife
17-Oct
41.7%
53.5%
USC Dornsife
21-Oct
42.1%
53.5%
USC Dornsife
25-Oct
42.3%
53.6%
USC Dornsife
28-Oct
42.4%
53.5%
42.4%
53.5%
Whitman Insight
13-Oct
42.0%
54.0%
42.0%
54.0%
Winston Group
26-Oct
43.0%
48.0%
43.0%
48.0%
YouGov
28-Aug
41.0%
47.0%
YouGov
1-Sep
40.0%
49.0%
YouGov
11-Sep
39.0%
49.0%
YouGov
15-Sep
41.0%
50.0%
YouGov
17-Sep
41.0%
47.0%
YouGov
23-Sep
44.0%
49.0%
YouGov
30-Sep
42.0%
50.0%
YouGov
5-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
YouGov
6-Oct
42.0%
51.0%
YouGov
11-Oct
43.0%
51.0%
YouGov
13-Oct
42.0%
52.0%
YouGov
20-Oct
43.0%
52.0%
YouGov
25-Oct
42.0%
54.0%
YouGov
27-Oct
43.5%
52.6%
43.5%
52.6%
Average of current polls
Average
42.5%
50.7%
2016 presidential election results
Trump
Clinton
Alabama
62.1%
34.4%
Alaska
51.3%
36.6%
Arizona
48.7%
45.1%
Arkansas
60.6%
33.7%
California
31.6%
61.8%
Colorado
43.2%
48.2%
Connecticut
40.9%
54.6%
Delaware
41.7%
53.0%
District of Columbia
4.1%
90.5%
Florida
49.0%
47.8%
Georgia
50.8%
45.6%
Hawaii
30.3%
62.2%
Idaho
59.3%
27.5%
Illinois
38.8%
55.8%
Indiana
56.8%
37.9%
Iowa
51.2%
41.8%
Kansas
56.7%
36.1%
Kentucky
62.5%
32.7%
Louisiana
58.1%
38.5%
Maine*
44.9%
47.8%
Maryland
33.9%
60.3%
Massachusetts
32.8%
60.0%
Michigan
47.5%
47.3%
Minnesota
44.9%
46.4%
Mississippi
57.9%
40.1%
Missouri
56.8%
38.1%
Montana
56.2%
35.8%
Nebraska*
58.8%
33.7%
Nevada
46.0%
47.5%
New Hampshire
46.7%
47.0%
New Jersey
44.0%
55.5%
New Mexico
40.0%
48.3%
New York
36.5%
59.0%
North Carolina
49.8%
46.2%
North Dakota
63.0%
27.0%
Ohio
51.7%
43.6%
Oklahoma
65.3%
28.9%
Oregon
39.1%
50.1%
Pennsylvania
48.2%
47.5%
Rhode Island
38.9%
54.4%
South Carolina
54.9%
40.7%
South Dakota
61.5%
31.8%
Tennessee
60.7%
34.7%
Texas
52.2%
43.2%
Utah
45.5%
27.5%
Vermont
30.3%
56.7%
Virginia
44.4%
49.7%
Washington
36.8%
52.5%
West Virginia
68.5%
26.4%
Wisconsin
47.2%
46.5%
Wyoming
67.4%
21.6%
2 comments
Please include ALL Presidential candidates in your reporting. I am a big fan of 3rd party candidates and a lot of polls and debates do not give them any exposure. Most 3rd party folks seem to have a lot better ideas than the tired folks the 2 old parties put up each term.
Hey Dave, Thanks for your suggestion. Here’s the problem. I can barely fit the data for just two candidates in the post so that the info can be read on a cell phone. Best, Randy