Who will win the 2020 presidential election?
Can the folks from Randy Lewis Racing REALLY accurately predict who will win the 2020 presidential election? Here’s how we see it. We’ve got a 50% chance! Remember, it’s easy to forget. This post is about polling, not politics.
Latest update: October 30, 2020
Please use the dropdown menus for each topic that interests you.
I used to love betting on sporting events. I could take the most off-the-wall game that I had no interest in, something like the Jacksonville Jaguars playing the Tennessee Titans and place a wager. If I bet on the Jaguars I instantly became a huge Jaguar fan and vice versa. I don’t bet on games much anymore.
I’m pretty sure you will not find a more apolitical individual than me. Nevertheless, I am intrigued by the outcome of the upcoming 2020 presidential election. That being the case I’m going to share some information with you that I get from a smartphone app called “PocketPolls”.
Before I go any further I will accept the fact that Democrats essentially hate Republicans and Republicans essentially hate Democrats. I’m not trying to change that. Hate on brothers and sisters. I’m just acknowledging that as fact. Some folks might challenge the word “hate”. They might prefer personal distaste, a distinct repelling feeling or whatever. I think hate covers most situations.
I know that each side spends most of their day criticizing and degrading the other party. Why? I guess just for the pure fun of it. In order to support one political party or the other that supporter has to denigrate any data that is supplied by the other side as being inaccurate, biased, distorted, and most likely all of those things. That’s usually until that data turns around and begins to support their point of view. It kinda goes like this, “The polls are bogus because they aren’t supporting my guy. I don’t believe ’em. Now the polls are tightening in favor of my guy. Yep. I believe in the polls”. Luckily, I guess, there are about 10-20% of the population who fall in between these two groups…..or outside these two groups.
Below I will share the results from a variety of polling organizations. I don’t support or endorse any of these groups. I couldn’t tell you if Charlie Manson’s children are behind one poll or the other. I am simply sharing the information verbatim. The polls I am sharing were taken as early as August 3, 2020, 90 days before the election date. As we go along I will continue to update the various polls. That might be a hassle but it’s only for two more months. You can come to this page as often as you want to see what the latest results are. I’m sure some will look at the polling sources and yell at their computer screen, “I wouldn’t believe those #$^#&$ for a New York minute!” While at the very same time another reader is looking at the same poll results and nodding their head yes as if to say, “That sounds reasonable to me”.
I actually happen to believe in polls in general. I figure if I asked a group of my friends how likely they were to come to my birthday party most of them would be willing to answer that question. If I asked all likely attendees if they preferred chocolate cake or vanilla cake (I would pick vanilla and probably wouldn’t even ask my quests this question) I’m pretty sure they would tell me their choice. Are people too shy, once they are asked a question to tell a stranger who they would vote for as their presidential choice? I don’t think so. I base this on just returning from a five-day, five-state tour of the midwest. It seemed as if every other lawn had a political sign touting their favorite. Yes, I believe in the presidential polls…in general…regardless of which candidate they might be in favor at the time the poll was taken.
I would caution against one thing. I am only the messenger. Don’t try to kill the messenger. If your guy is ahead in a particular poll it’s not all that worthwhile to crow about it. If your guy is behind in a particular poll it’s not all that worthwhile to denigrate the polls.
I know that lots of people are fond of saying the polls got it wrong last time and they normally get it wrong. I don’t really support that kind of thinking. If I were running a polling organization I would like to make my results as accurate as possible so that somebody might hire me based upon my expert polling capabilities the next time around.
Below you will see how Randy Lewis Racing is projecting the outcome of the race. Please….save your “I told you so messages”. This is based upon the most current polls. They may change a little or a lot and not at all in the coming days and weeks. If the polls change from one candidate to another then I will change my prediction. I am just projecting the results of all available national and state polls that appear in my PocketPolls app.
1. I will first list the projected electoral votes for the 2020 election by candidate. This is based upon the 2016 election results and current polling. From here you will see exactly who Randy Lewis Racing expects to win the election….now. However, if the polls change RLR can and will change their prediction.
2. The national polls are next. I’ll take an average of all national polls always deleting any “old” poll by one pollster who has published a more recent poll. No double counting. I’ll keep the numbers from all polls since August 3, 2020 (90 days before the election) up to the most current so you can see the results from each pollster. That way you can get an apples to apples comparison (changes in the poll…from the same pollster, etc.). Trust me, only the most recent results from each pollster are included in the results. You can trust ME, right? I’m the most apolitical person you know.
3. This section includes the state polls. Same rationale as the national polls.
4. Next is a table that shows the popular vote percentages for each candidate from the 2016 election.
Some states are already pretty well decided. About ten others are still in the undecided category. I’m using the current polls to allocate those electoral votes to whichever candidate has the current lead in that state in the most current polls.
If one political party won a state by more than 5% in 2016 I’m giving them credit for that state to carry in the 2020 election. When the 2016 results were somewhat close and/or the polls are somewhat close now I’m throwing that state in the undecided category.
I think it might be kind of fun to look at this ongoingly and just see how close these prognosticators come to do the actual results.
I do know that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in the 2016 election by about 3 million votes. I did some research and found 38 different polls that were projecting the results the week before the 2016 election. On average Clinton was expected to win by 2.7%. I don’t know if those projections were for the popular vote or simply to win the election outright. Probably to win the election. A variance of 2.7% doesn’t seem like much to me, certainly not a landslide. On the other hand, President Trump won three different large states (Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin) by a total of 77,000 votes. It’s pretty amazing that in a country with 350 million people (about 136 million people voted) the fact that if about 40,000 people have voted for the other candidate the electoral college results would have been different. Did the 2016 pollsters really get it wrong? It’s true they didn’t pick the winner. But in reality, the polls didn’t seem to be off by very much to me….if 40,000 people vote the other way the polls were right…..but 40,000 people voted for who they voted for….so the national polls were wrong.
Again, I am not providing this to support either candidate. I told you I was the most apolitical individual that you know and I am.
You can leave a message on this post. However, if I deem it to be political, and my stuff is never about politics, I will simply delete it. Feel free to rant and rave in personal messages to me. I can take it.
I wish good luck and good health to each of the 2020 presidential political candidates. The future is impossible to predict…but polls might help with that. Heaven forbid if one candidate or the other tests positive for COVID-19 before the election. I wouldn’t want to be the campaign manager who gets to share that information (or not!) with the public. I do know this. It’s my saying of the year. “It doesn’t matter what people read, see or hear…it’s what they think and want to believe”.
Projected Electoral
votes |
|||||
2020
Projected winner |
Electoral votes | Trump | Biden | Polls | |
188 | 350 | ||||
Alabama | 9 | 9 | |||
Alaska | 3 | 3 | |||
Arizona | 11 | 11 | +2.7% | B | |
Arkansas | 6 | 6 | |||
California | 55 | 55 | |||
Colorado | 9 | 9 | |||
Connecticut | 7 | 7 | |||
Delaware | 3 | 3 | |||
District of Columbia | 3 | 3 | |||
Florida | 29 | 29 | +2.3% | B | |
Georgia | 16 | 16 | +2.1% | B | |
Hawaii | 4 | 4 | |||
Idaho | 4 | 4 | |||
Illinois | 20 | 20 | |||
Indiana | 11 | 11 | |||
Iowa | 6 | 6 | +0.2% | T | |
Kansas | 6 | 6 | |||
Kentucky | 8 | 8 | |||
Louisiana | 8 | 8 | |||
Maine* | 4 | 4 | |||
Maryland | 10 | 10 | |||
Massachusetts | 11 | 11 | |||
Michigan | 16 | 16 | +8.1 | B | |
Minnesota | 10 | 10 | +8.2 | B | |
Mississippi | 6 | 6 | |||
Missouri | 10 | 10 | |||
Montana | 3 | 3 | |||
Nebraska* | 5 | 5 | |||
Nevada | 6 | 6 | +5.6 | B | |
New Hampshire | 4 | 4 | |||
New Jersey | 14 | 14 | |||
New Mexico | 5 | 5 | |||
New York | 29 | 29 | |||
North Carolina | 15 | 15 | +2.2 | B | |
North Dakota | 3 | 3 | |||
Ohio | 18 | 18 | 1.7 | T | |
Oklahoma | 7 | 7 | |||
Oregon | 7 | 7 | |||
Pennsylvania | 20 | 20 | +5.8 | B | |
Rhode Island | 4 | 4 | |||
South Carolina | 9 | 9 | |||
South Dakota | 3 | 3 | |||
Tennessee | 11 | 11 | |||
Texas | 38 | 38 | 1.0 | T | |
Utah | 6 | 6 | |||
Vermont | 3 | 3 | |||
Virginia | 13 | 13 | |||
Washington | 12 | 12 | |||
West Virginia | 5 | 5 | |||
Wisconsin | 10 | 10 | +8.0 | B | |
Wyoming | 3 | 3 | |||
* Maine/Nebraska allow their votes to be split by congressional district | |||||
Assumes the party that won a state in 2016 wins it again unless there is a big 2020 poll change |
NATIONAL POLL RESULTS | |||||
Trump | Biden | Variance | |||
3 Week National Average | 1-Sep | 41.7% | 49.8% | 8.1% | |
3 Week National Average | 9-Sep | 42.0% | 49.6% | 7.6% | |
3 Week National Average | 14-Sep | 42.6% | 49.7% | 7.1% | |
3 Week National Average | 17-Sep | 42.1% | 50.3% | 8.2% | |
3 Week National Average | 25-Sep | 42.0% | 50.3% | 8.3% | |
3 Week National Average | 28-Sep | 41.7% | 50.3% | 8.6% | |
3 Week National Average | 4-Oct | 42.1% | 50.2% | 8.1% | |
3 Week National Average | 8-Oct | 41.8% | 50.6% | 8.8% | |
3 Week National Average | 12-Oct | 41.8% | 50.8% | 9.0% | |
3 Week National Average | 14-Oct | 41.6% | 51.2% | 9.6% | |
3 Week National Average | 19-Oct | 41.3% | 51.6% | 10.3% | |
3 Week National Average | 22-Oct | 41.6% | 51.7% | 10.1% | |
3 Week National Average | 27-Oct | 41.7% | 51.6% | 9.9% | |
3 Week National Average | 29-Oct | 42.4% | 51.6% | 9.2% | |
ABC News/Washington Post | 15-Aug | 44.0% | 54.0% | ||
ABC News/Washington Post | 24-Sep | 43.0% | 53.0% | ||
ABC News/Washington Post | 9-Oct | 43.0% | 54.0% | 43.0% | 54.0% |
AP/NORC | 14-Sep | 40.0% | 44.0% | ||
AP/NORC | 12-Oct | 36.0% | 51.0% | 36.0% | 51.0% |
Atlas International | 30-Aug | 46.3% | 49.4% | ||
Atlas International | 28-Oct | 50.9% | 46.2% | 50.9% | 46.2% |
CCES/YouGov | 27-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | 43.0% | 51.0% |
Change Research | 23-Aug | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
Change Research | 6-Sep | 43.0% | 49.0% | ||
Change Research | 20-Sep | 42.0% | 51.0% | ||
Change Research | 30-Sep | 41.0% | 54.0% | ||
Change Research | 4-Oct | 42.0% | 52.0% | ||
Change Research | 18-Oct | 42.0% | 52.0% | ||
Change Research | 24-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | 43.0% | 51.0% |
Climate/Nexus | 9-Sep | 41.0% | 52.0% | 41.0% | 52.0% |
Colby College | 23-Sep | 43.0% | 46.0% | ||
Colby College | 25-Oct | 42.0% | 46.0% | 42.0% | 46.0% |
Cometrends | 26-Oct | 44.0% | 56.0% | 44.0% | 56.0% |
CNBC | 24-Oct | 40.0% | 51.0% | 40.0% | 51.0% |
CNN/SSRS | 15-Aug | 46.0% | 50.0% | ||
CNN/SSRS | 1-Sep | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
CNN/SSRS | 4-Oct | 41.0% | 56.0% | ||
CNN/SSRS | 26-Oct | 42.0% | 54.0% | 42.0% | 54.0% |
Critical Insights | 9-Aug | 38.0% | 39.0% | ||
Critical Insights | 4-Oct | 49.0% | 41.0% | 49.0% | 41.0% |
Data for Progress | 14-Aug | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
Data for Progress | 1-Sep | 42.8% | 53.0% | ||
Data for Progress | 15-Sep | 42.2% | 52.8% | ||
Data for Progress | 1-Oct | 41.0% | 51.0% | ||
Data for Progress | 6-Oct | 40.8% | 56.2% | ||
Data for Progress | 20-Oct | 43.7% | 53.9% | 43.7% | 53.9% |
Ecelon Insights | 18-Aug | 38.0% | 51.0% | ||
Ecelon Insights | 25-Sep | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
Ecelon Insights | 20-Oct | 44.0% | 50.0% | 44.0% | 50.0% |
Ecos Research | 16-Aug | 41.5% | 42.9% | 41.5% | 42.9% |
Edison Research | 8-Oct | 34.8% | 48.1% | 34.8% | 48.1% |
Emerson College | 31-Aug | 48.5% | 51.5% | ||
Emerson College | 25-Sep | 46.6% | 49.6% | 46.6% | 49.6% |
Emerson College | 26-Oct | 46.7% | 50.9% | 46.7% | 50.9% |
Fabrizio Ward/Hart | 5-Sep | 35.0% | 58.0% | 45.0% | 49.0% |
FM3 Research | 4-Oct | 42.0% | 53.0% | 45.0% | 49.0% |
Fox News | 12-Aug | 42.0% | 49.0% | ||
Fox News | 10-Sep | 46.0% | 51.0% | ||
Fox News | 6-Oct | 43.0% | 52.0% | 43.0% | 52.0% |
GBAO | 19-Oct | 40.0% | 53.0% | 40.0% | 53.0% |
Georgetown University | 6-Aug | 40.0% | 53.3% | 40.0% | 53.3% |
Global Marketing Research | 4-Oct | 37.0% | 51.0% | ||
Global Marketing Research | 27-Oct | 38.0% | 52.5% | 38.0% | 52.5% |
Global Strategy | 24-Aug | 41.0% | 54.0% | ||
Global Strategy | 31-Aug | 43.0% | 52.0% | ||
Global Strategy | 14-Sep | 42.0% | 53.0% | ||
Global Strategy | 21-Sep | 42.0% | 53.0% | ||
Global Strategy | 28-Sep | 43.0% | 53.0% | ||
Global Strategy | 5-Oct | 44.0% | 52.0% | ||
Global Strategy | 12-Oct | 43.0% | 53.0% | ||
Global Strategy | 19-Oct | 43.0% | 53.0% | 43.0% | 53.0% |
HarrisX | 28-Aug | 38.0% | 47.0% | ||
HarrisX | 31-Aug | 40.0% | 46.0% | ||
HarrisX | 2-Sep | 47.0% | 53.0% | ||
HarrisX | 8-Sep | 39.0% | 47.0% | ||
HarrisX | 14-Sep | 39.0% | 45.0% | ||
HarrisX | 21-Sep | 40.0% | 45.0% | ||
HarrisX | 24-Sep | 45.0% | 47.0% | ||
HarrisX | 1-Oct | 40.0% | 47.0% | ||
HarrisX | 6-Oct | 40.0% | 45.0% | ||
HarrisX | 13-Oct | 40.0% | 47.0% | ||
HarrisX | 15-Oct | 42.0% | 46.0% | ||
HarrisX | 28-Oct | 47.0% | 53.0% | 47.0% | 53.0% |
Hart Research | 7-Sep | 43.0% | 51.0% | 43.0% | 51.0% |
Hofstra University | 22-Sep | 41.9% | 53.2% | ||
Hofstra University | 26-Oct | 42.5% | 53.9% | 42.5% | 53.9% |
IBD/TIPP | 1-Sep | 41.0% | 49.0% | ||
IBD/TIPP | 19-Sep | 43.9% | 49.5% | ||
IBD/TIPP | 1-Oct | 45.9% | 48.6% | ||
IBD/TIPP | 12-Oct | 42.4% | 51.4% | ||
IBD/TIPP | 17-Oct | 44.1% | 49.8% | ||
IBD/TIPP | 21-Oct | 45.6% | 49.8% | ||
IBD/TIPP | 25-Oct | 44.7% | 51.5% | ||
IBD/TIPP | 28-Oct | 44.8% | 50.3% | 44.8% | 50.3% |
Inovative Research | 6-Oct | 42.0% | 47.0% | 42.0% | 47.0% |
Ipsos | 25-Aug | 37.0% | 44.0% | ||
Ipsos | 1-Sep | 38.0% | 43.0% | ||
Ipsos | 8-Sep | 40.0% | 48.0% | ||
Ipsos | 15-Sep | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
Ipsos | 17-Sep | 42.0% | 51.0% | ||
Ipsos | 24-Sep | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
Ipsos | 1-Oct | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
Ipsos | 3-Oct | 40.0% | 48.0% | ||
Ipsos | 6-Oct | 40.0% | 52.0% | ||
Ipsos | 8-Oct | 41.0% | 53.0% | ||
Ipsos | 13-Oct | 37.0% | 43.0% | ||
Ipsos | 15-Oct | 38.0% | 48.0% | ||
Ipsos | 20-Oct | 42.0% | 51.0% | ||
Ipsos | 22-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
Ipsos | 27-Oct | 42.0% | 52.0% | 42.0% | 52.0% |
J.L. Partners | 23-Sep | 41.0% | 51.0% | ||
J.L. Partners | 13-Oct | 42.0% | 52.0% | ||
J.L. Partners | 28-Oct | 41.0% | 55.0% | 41.0% | 55.0% |
John Zogby | 29-Aug | 42.0% | 45.0% | ||
John Zogby | 2-Oct | 44.9% | 47.3% | 44.9% | 47.3% |
Kaiser Family Foundation | 3-Sep | 43.0% | 48.0% | ||
Kaiser Family Foundation | 12-Oct | 38.0% | 49.0% | 38.0% | 49.0% |
Leger | 23-Aug | 40.0% | 49.0% | ||
Leger | 30-Aug | 42.0% | 49.0% | ||
Leger | 6-Sep | 41.0% | 47.0% | ||
Leger | 13-Sep | 41.0% | 47.0% | ||
Leger | 20-Sep | 41.0% | 48.0% | ||
Leger | 27-Sep | 40.0% | 47.0% | ||
Leger | 4-Oct | 40.0% | 49.0% | ||
Leger | 11-Oct | 39.0% | 50.0% | ||
Leger | 18-Oct | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
Leger | 25-Oct | 41.0% | 49.0% | 41.0% | 49.0% |
LOC Wick | 28-Aug | 49.3% | 47.5% | 49.3% | 47.5% |
Long Island University | 27-Oct | 36.0% | 47.0% | 36.0% | 47.0% |
Marist College | 11-Aug | 42.0% | 53.0% | ||
Marist College | 16-Sep | 42.0% | 49.0% | ||
Marist College | 13-Oct | 42.0% | 54.0% | 42.0% | 54.0% |
Marquette Law School | 15-Sep | 40.0% | 50.0% | 40.0% | 50.0% |
Monmouth University | 10-Aug | 41.0% | 51.0% | ||
Monmouth University | 8-Sep | 44.0% | 51.0% | ||
Monmouth University | 27-Sep | 45.0% | 50.0% | 45.0% | 50.0% |
Morning Consult | 23-Aug | 42.0% | 52.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 29-Aug | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 5-Sep | 44.0% | 50.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 13-Sep | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 22-Sep | 41.0% | 48.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 27-Sep | 44.0% | 51.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 2-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 7-Oct | 43.0% | 52.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 9-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 14-Oct | 43.0% | 52.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 20-Oct | 43.0% | 52.0% | ||
Morning Consult | 25-Oct | 43.0% | 52.0% | 43.0% | 52.0% |
NBC News/Wall Street Journal | 12-Aug | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
NBC News/Wall Street Journal | 16-Sep | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
NBC News/Wall Street Journal | 1-Oct | 39.0% | 53.0% | ||
NBC News/Wall Street Journal | 12-Oct | 42.0% | 53.0% | 42.0% | 53.0% |
Opinium | 26-Aug | 39.1% | 53.6% | ||
Opinium | 10-Sep | 42.2% | 51.2% | ||
Opinium | 12-Oct | 40.0% | 57.0% | ||
Opinium | 29-Oct | 41.0% | 53.0% | 41.0% | 53.0% |
Pan Atlantic Research | 6-Oct | 36.5% | 54.0% | 36.5% | 54.0% |
Pew Research Center | 10/ | 42.0% | 52.0% | 42.0% | 52.0% |
Politico/Harvard | 6-Sep | 42.0% | 52.0% | 42.0% | 52.0% |
Public Religion Research | 12-Oct | 38.0% | 56.0% | 38.0% | 56.0% |
Qriously | 31-Aug | 41.0% | 46.0% | ||
Qriously | 7-Sep | 41.0% | 47.0% | ||
Qriously | 13-Sep | 42.0% | 46.0% | ||
Qriously | 20-Sep | 38.6% | 46.4% | ||
Qriously | 27-Sep | 40.0% | 50.0% | ||
Qriously | 4-Oct | 38.0% | 51.0% | ||
Qriously | 12-Oct | 38.0% | 52.0% | ||
Qriously | 19-Oct | 39.0% | 51.0% | ||
Qriously | 26-Oct | 39.0% | 49.0% | 39.0% | 49.0% |
Quinnipiac University | 31-Aug | 42.0% | 52.0% | ||
Quinnipiac University | 14-Sep | 44.0% | 53.0% | ||
Quinnipiac University | 21-Sep | 42.0% | 52.0% | ||
Quinnipiac University | 19-Oct | 41.0% | 51.0% | 41.0% | 51.0% |
Rasmussen/Pulse | 25-Aug | 45.0% | 46.0% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 1-Sep | 45.0% | 49.0% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 8-Sep | 45.9% | 47.6% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 15-Sep | 46.6% | 46.1% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 22-Sep | 47.0% | 48.0% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 29-Sep | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 6-Oct | 40.0% | 52.0% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 13-Oct | 45.0% | 50.0% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 20-Oct | 46.0% | 49.0% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 25-Oct | 48.0% | 47.0% | ||
Rasmussen/Pulse | 28-Oct | 47.0% | 48.0% | 47.0% | 48.0% |
Redfield & Wilton | 26-Aug | 38.8% | 48.9% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 1-Sep | 40.8% | 49.1% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 8-Sep | 40.3% | 49.3% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 17-Sep | 41.5% | 48.6% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 23-Sep | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 27-Sep | 40.0% | 50.0% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 4-Oct | 42.0% | 50.0% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 10-Oct | 41.0% | 49.0% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 18-Oct | 40.0% | 51.0% | ||
Redfield & Wilton | 26-Oct | 37.0% | 47.0% | 37.0% | 47.0% |
Research Co. | 4-Aug | 38.0% | 48.0% | ||
Research Co. | 6-Sep | 41.0% | 49.0% | ||
Research Co. | 18-Oct | 42.0% | 50.0% | 42.0% | 50.0% |
Rethink Priorities | 20-Oct | 41.5% | 51.3% | 41.5% | 51.3% |
RMG Research | 29-Aug | 44.0% | 48.0% | ||
RMG Research | 12-Sep | 43.0% | 48.0% | ||
RMG Research | 19-Sep | 44.0% | 50.0% | ||
RMG Research | 26-Sep | 45.0% | 51.0% | ||
RMG Research | 3-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
RMG Research | 10-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
RMG Research | 17-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
RMG Research | 24-Oct | 44.0% | 51.0% | 44.0% | 51.0% |
Saint Leo University | 2-Oct | 38.3% | 52.1% | 38.3% | 52.1% |
Siena College/NY Times | 16-Sep | 45.0% | 47.0% | ||
Siena College/NY Times | 24-Sep | 41.0% | 49.0% | ||
Siena College/NY Times | 27-Sep | 41.0% | 48.0% | ||
Siena College/NY Times | 18-Oct | 41.0% | 50.0% | 41.0% | 50.0% |
Slezer & Co. | 30-Aug | 41.0% | 49.0% | 41.0% | 49.0% |
Spry Strategies | 23-Oct | 46.0% | 47.9% | 46.0% | 47.9% |
Suffolk University | 31-Aug | 41.6% | 46.9% | ||
Suffolk University | 20-Sep | 45.5% | 46.8% | ||
Suffolk University | 27-Oct | 44.3% | 51.8% | 44.3% | 51.8% |
SurveyMonkey | 30-Sep | 46.0% | 52.0% | ||
SurveyMonkey | 11-Oct | 46.5% | 51.5% | ||
SurveyMonkey | 17-Oct | 45.0% | 53.0% | ||
SurveyMonkey | 20-Oct | 46.0% | 52.0% | ||
SurveyMonkey | 25-Oct | 46.0% | 52.0% | 46.0% | 52.0% |
SurveyUSA | 4-Oct | 43.0% | 53.0% | ||
SurveyUSA | 19-Oct | 43.0% | 53.0% | 43.0% | 53.0% |
SurveyUSA | 27-Oct | 48.6% | 51.4% | 48.6% | 51.4% |
Swayable | 26-Oct | 45.7% | 51.4% | 45.7% | 51.4% |
Targoz Market Research | 6-Sep | 46.3% | 47.5% | 46.3% | 47.5% |
Tufts | 25-Oct | 45.0% | 52.0% | 45.0% | 52.0% |
University of Maryland | 23-Aug | 38.9% | 47.5% | 38.9% | 47.5% |
University of Massachusetts Lowell | 12-Oct | 43.0% | 53.0% | 43.0% | 53.0% |
USC Dornsife | 30-Aug | 40.2% | 53.6% | ||
USC Dornsife | 31-Aug | 41.6% | 51.9% | ||
USC Dornsife | 4-Sep | 41.1% | 52.1% | ||
USC Dornsife | 12-Sep | 40.5% | 54.3% | ||
USC Dornsife | 15-Sep | 43.4% | 50.4% | ||
USC Dornsife | 19-Sep | 42.2% | 51.6% | ||
USC Dornsife | 23-Sep | 42.0% | 51.9% | ||
USC Dornsife | 26-Sep | 42.5% | 51.4% | ||
USC Dornsife | 1-Oct | 43.3% | 51.3% | ||
USC Dornsife | 3-Oct | 42.7% | 52.2% | ||
USC Dornsife | 6-Oct | 42.4% | 52.6% | ||
USC Dornsife | 10-Oct | 41.6% | 53.4% | ||
USC Dornsife | 12-Oct | 41.3% | 54.0% | ||
USC Dornsife | 17-Oct | 41.7% | 53.5% | ||
USC Dornsife | 21-Oct | 42.1% | 53.5% | ||
USC Dornsife | 25-Oct | 42.3% | 53.6% | ||
USC Dornsife | 28-Oct | 42.4% | 53.5% | 42.4% | 53.5% |
Whitman Insight | 13-Oct | 42.0% | 54.0% | 42.0% | 54.0% |
Winston Group | 26-Oct | 43.0% | 48.0% | 43.0% | 48.0% |
YouGov | 28-Aug | 41.0% | 47.0% | ||
YouGov | 1-Sep | 40.0% | 49.0% | ||
YouGov | 11-Sep | 39.0% | 49.0% | ||
YouGov | 15-Sep | 41.0% | 50.0% | ||
YouGov | 17-Sep | 41.0% | 47.0% | ||
YouGov | 23-Sep | 44.0% | 49.0% | ||
YouGov | 30-Sep | 42.0% | 50.0% | ||
YouGov | 5-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
YouGov | 6-Oct | 42.0% | 51.0% | ||
YouGov | 11-Oct | 43.0% | 51.0% | ||
YouGov | 13-Oct | 42.0% | 52.0% | ||
YouGov | 20-Oct | 43.0% | 52.0% | ||
YouGov | 25-Oct | 42.0% | 54.0% | ||
YouGov | 27-Oct | 43.5% | 52.6% | 43.5% | 52.6% |
Average of current polls | Average | 42.5% | 50.7% |
2016 presidential election results | Trump | Clinton |
Alabama | 62.1% | 34.4% |
Alaska | 51.3% | 36.6% |
Arizona | 48.7% | 45.1% |
Arkansas | 60.6% | 33.7% |
California | 31.6% | 61.8% |
Colorado | 43.2% | 48.2% |
Connecticut | 40.9% | 54.6% |
Delaware | 41.7% | 53.0% |
District of Columbia | 4.1% | 90.5% |
Florida | 49.0% | 47.8% |
Georgia | 50.8% | 45.6% |
Hawaii | 30.3% | 62.2% |
Idaho | 59.3% | 27.5% |
Illinois | 38.8% | 55.8% |
Indiana | 56.8% | 37.9% |
Iowa | 51.2% | 41.8% |
Kansas | 56.7% | 36.1% |
Kentucky | 62.5% | 32.7% |
Louisiana | 58.1% | 38.5% |
Maine* | 44.9% | 47.8% |
Maryland | 33.9% | 60.3% |
Massachusetts | 32.8% | 60.0% |
Michigan | 47.5% | 47.3% |
Minnesota | 44.9% | 46.4% |
Mississippi | 57.9% | 40.1% |
Missouri | 56.8% | 38.1% |
Montana | 56.2% | 35.8% |
Nebraska* | 58.8% | 33.7% |
Nevada | 46.0% | 47.5% |
New Hampshire | 46.7% | 47.0% |
New Jersey | 44.0% | 55.5% |
New Mexico | 40.0% | 48.3% |
New York | 36.5% | 59.0% |
North Carolina | 49.8% | 46.2% |
North Dakota | 63.0% | 27.0% |
Ohio | 51.7% | 43.6% |
Oklahoma | 65.3% | 28.9% |
Oregon | 39.1% | 50.1% |
Pennsylvania | 48.2% | 47.5% |
Rhode Island | 38.9% | 54.4% |
South Carolina | 54.9% | 40.7% |
South Dakota | 61.5% | 31.8% |
Tennessee | 60.7% | 34.7% |
Texas | 52.2% | 43.2% |
Utah | 45.5% | 27.5% |
Vermont | 30.3% | 56.7% |
Virginia | 44.4% | 49.7% |
Washington | 36.8% | 52.5% |
West Virginia | 68.5% | 26.4% |
Wisconsin | 47.2% | 46.5% |
Wyoming | 67.4% | 21.6% |
2 comments
Please include ALL Presidential candidates in your reporting. I am a big fan of 3rd party candidates and a lot of polls and debates do not give them any exposure. Most 3rd party folks seem to have a lot better ideas than the tired folks the 2 old parties put up each term.
Hey Dave, Thanks for your suggestion. Here’s the problem. I can barely fit the data for just two candidates in the post so that the info can be read on a cell phone. Best, Randy